Modal Demo

The Five Sales Letters Every Marketer Should Know, Hands Down

The Five Sales Letters Every Marketer Should Know, Hands Down

Today's Eggspert Avatar
Today's Eggspert Avatar

Disclosure: Our content is reader-supported, which means we earn commissions from links on Crazy Egg. Commissions do not affect our editorial evaluations or opinions.

There are few better people to learn direct response copywriting from than the โ€œAdmenโ€: the original rockstar copywriters of the twentieth century magazine and newspaper ads.

Iโ€™ve sifted through the reams of great copywriting and distilled things down to just five examples.

All the examples for this article are โ€œbite-sizedโ€ โ€“ short enough to read without taking up too much time โ€“ but also containing all the persuasive elements necessary to do the job.

But copying othersโ€™ work will only get you so far without understanding why it worked. Thatโ€™s why, for each example, Iโ€™m going to deconstruct exactly what made it so effective, then tell you how to apply it in your funnel.

Here they are: the best five sales letters of all time.

Sales Letter #1: Gary Halbertโ€™s Desperate Nerd From Ohio

Need cash fast

Read the complete letter here

Why You Need to Know It

In sales youโ€™re always trying to climb two metaphorical mountains โ€“ plausibility and authority โ€“ in different proportions, depending on the product and market.

Plausibility Authority

Plausibility means can you convince the reader a solution is possible. Say youโ€™re teaching them to make money from home. If a reader sees your ad and thinks โ€œthatโ€™s hogwash โ€“ no one can do that,โ€ youโ€™re dead-in-the-water.

Garyโ€™s ad is the perfect vehicle for a market who needs some convincing. The โ€œdesperate nerdโ€ bit isnโ€™t accidental; itโ€™s the crucial bit that proves to the audience Garyโ€™s โ€œmoneymaking secretโ€ is possible. Why? By telling the story of someone who started worse off than the average reader, and still got amazing results.

โ€œIf a DESPERATE NERD can do it,โ€ imagines a reader, โ€œmaybe I can too.โ€

cool-guy

But thatโ€™s only half of the pictureโ€ฆ

Authority means the reader trusts (a) that you have the ability to solve the problem and that (b) you have a monopoly on the solution.

The first is important because unless the reader believes you can solve his problem, he wonโ€™t pay you to do it, and the second is important because unless he believes youโ€™re the best solution, heโ€™ll either do it himself or find the lowest-priced competitor.

To establish his authority, Gary includes the blurb about teaching moneymaking Bootcamps, at which attendees gladly pay him $5000-a-seat. He also includes specific numbers, like โ€œmake up to 10,000 per dayโ€, and โ€œI was once paid $2,500 for one of these.โ€

How to Use It

This is a great template for Facebook ads and landing pages, provided your market fits the moldโ€ฆ

Selling a solution to a market that hasnโ€™t been exposed to your offer before, and are skeptical of their chances of success? Donโ€™t be afraid to use a compelling anecdoteโ€ฆ

have-you-solve-the-problem

Whatโ€™s a detail about you that made is more unlikely, and hence, will make you more relatable to the reader? (Dyslexia, you started off broke, everybody told you โ€œit couldnโ€™t be doneโ€, etc.)

Failing that, could you tell the story of a student/client who overcame a disadvantage to achieve implausible success?

Donโ€™t forget to supply ample proof, though; otherwise they wonโ€™t believe you really have the secret solution.

Could you include real screenshots of your results? (i.e. a payment you received, or a competition you won)

Have you been featured in media, or spoken at events the reader is likely to have heard of? Include the logos, and/or mention where youโ€™ve been featured, just as Gary does with his $5000-a-head bootcamps.

Sales Letter #2: Frank Kernโ€™s consulting letter โ€“ Would You Like Me To Personally Doubleโ€ฆ Your Business, For Free?

Quadruple business

Read the complete letter here

Why You Need to Know It

Frank might be the most-copied direct response marketer of the modern era, from the โ€œfrom the desk ofโ€ to the cadence of the headline โ€“ โ€œ2x, 3xโ€ฆeven 5x!!!โ€

But the genius of this landing page is how it cuts through a crowded space with authority (Kernโ€™s name) and surprise (wait โ€“ heโ€™ll do it for FREE?).

It has the same ingredients of the Halbert ad but in different proportions. Unlike Gary, Kernโ€™s selling consulting B2B, so he doesnโ€™t waste much ink proving that growth is possible; presumably the reader already knows this, otherwise he wouldnโ€™t be in business.

But what it lacks in novelty, it makes-up-for with proof and authority โ€“ โ€œIโ€™ve generated over 47 millionโ€, and a risk reversal โ€“ โ€œIโ€™ll write you a check for $1500โ€.

Finally, it has built in scarcity (the reader knows Frankโ€™s famous, and imagines that his 1:1 spots are limited, and Frank reminds us).

How to Use It

This is perfect for Facebook ads, landing pages, sales pages, and even sales emails in a crowded market, if your readers are jaded, and if youโ€™ve got some personal authority or a track-record of success.

Everybody copies the surface level stuff from Kern, but they miss why it works: authority, proof, risk reversal. Want to sell high ticket consulting or a 4-figure info product? How could you prove to the reader itโ€™s going to work? Could you offer a guarantee, as Frank does? If youโ€™re not as well known (few are) could you make your clients/studentsโ€™ success the highlight?

Finally, what tangible result could you point to โ€œwould you like me to grow your sales 25% in 3 daysโ€ โ€“ and what surprise element? (โ€œOr your money back/Iโ€™ll pay you/etc.โ€)

Sales Letter #3: Joseph Sugarmanโ€™s Vision Breakthrough

Blu Blockers

Read the complete letter here

Why You Need to Know It

YES, dear readerโ€ฆ

You absolutely need the basics of persuasion in your adโ€ฆ

Value, authority, proof.

But what if nobody actually reads your copy because itโ€™s so booooooring?!?

Ever see an Andre Chaperon email? (Or a carbon-copy)

If you have, thereโ€™s a surefire way to recognize it. Guess what it is?

Cโ€™mon โ€“ bet you canโ€™t guessโ€ฆ

Itโ€™s the very writing style I just used above. A narrative style that pulls your eye down the page.

โ€ฆand thatโ€™s not all ๐Ÿ˜‰

It makes it fun to read.

And the modern godfather of โ€œstickyโ€ copy thatโ€™s fun-to-read regardless of its content is one Mr. Joseph Sugarman.

The Blublockers ad, better than maybe-any-other, typifies Sugarmanโ€™s meandering style, a big contrast to the National Enquirer-style ads of Gary Halbert and John Carlton. Those โ€œboy eats own headโ€ ads often donโ€™t work for higher-sophistication markets, but Sugarmanโ€™s approach does.

But it still contains the โ€œcrucial ingredientsโ€โ€ฆ

The audience thinks they know sunglasses, but Sugarman needs to create a brand new product category. The ad needs to pierce the jadedness around sunglasses (which it does with the โ€œslippery slideโ€ narrative style), but also, once theyโ€™re reading, to prove these arenโ€™t any ordinary sunglasses; he does that with the content of the opening story, but also by doing what Eugene Schwartz calls โ€œmechanizingโ€; describing the construction and finally, with the guarantee.

How to Use It

If youโ€™re selling a version of something everybody thinks theyโ€™ve seen before, what story could you tell to grab their interest?

More microscopically, how could you phrase your copy so it reads like poetry, each sentence coaxing the eye to the nextโ€ฆ

Could you leave โ€œopen loopsโ€, leaving a question unresolvedโ€ฆ

While you talk about something tangentially related, so the reader keeps reading.

Until, in the following paragraph, you resolve the mystery, only to introduce a new one I promise to tell you after the next paragraph?

Finally, could you tell an entertaining origin story that creates a brand new category for your product, as Sugarman does here, or as the Dyson company did for its household vacuums?

Sales Letter #4: Martin Conroyโ€™s Two Young Men letter for the Wall Street Journal

The wall street journal

Read the complete letter here

Why You Need to Know It

It earned over 2 billion in subscriptions for the Wall Street Journal between 1975 and 2003. But even thatโ€™s not the most important reasonโ€ฆ

Psychology tells us an โ€œopen loopโ€ narrative styleโ€ฆ

that leads with a mysteryโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ˜‰

โ€ฆis more attention-grabbing than a simple statement of benefits.

At the end of the โ€œtwo menโ€ intro weโ€™re left with an unresolved question โ€“ how is it one man became president of the company โ€“ and that holds our attention through the description of the journal. To say that by modern sales letter standards the โ€œtwo menโ€ letter is short on proof misses the point: the tap dance this letter must accomplish is to stop short enough of promising the journal will lead to wealth, to avoid legal disclaimers, while implying that a subscription will lead to success strongly enough to plant a seed in the readerโ€™s mind.

How to Use It

The tone of the โ€œtwo menโ€ letter is a great fit for Facebook ads, email funnels, and sales pages for a certain category of product. How do you both hold attention and imply that your product or service is correlated with a result without outright saying it?

If your readers are jaded or bored with the product category (for instance: newspapers), this mystery-driven approach could work better than a direct one. You can also set up a mystery at the end of one email and promise to resolve it in the next one, which will ensure itโ€™s more widely-read.

Sales Letter #5: Why Havenโ€™t TV Owners Been Told These Facts, from Breakthrough Advertising by Eugene Schwartz

TV facts

Read the complete letter here

Why You Need to Know It

Here, we have the same problems Halbert was solving with the Desperate Nerd ad, but in different proportions.

The readers still needed convincing of the plausibility of the solution. As Schwartz describes it:

โ€œOnly a small fraction considered themselves interested enough or capable enough to respond to a direct promise headline: โ€œSave up to $100 a year on your TV repairs!โ€ Most were afraid they could not make the repairs themselves.โ€

But they were also a jaded market, so the sensationalist, โ€œboy-eats-own-headโ€ approach Halbert and John Carlton are known for would have raised too many โ€œred flags.โ€

The TV repair ad, as rewritten, is a masterclass on the subtle techniques of winning over a reader whoโ€™s seen it all before, and thinks itโ€™s not for him.

The โ€œenvy rationaleโ€ it sets up โ€“ that thereโ€™s a group of people enjoying superior results, and wouldnโ€™t you like to be them โ€“ is a high-leverage tool modern copywriters like Ramit Sethi use to sell nearly-$10,000 info products.

Hereโ€™s why it works: As Schwartz describes, the market didnโ€™t yet believe they had the ability to repair their own TVs.

But they had frustration that their TVs didnโ€™t work as intended.

So thatโ€™s where the ad starts โ€“ โ€œwhy havenโ€™t TV owners been told these facts.โ€ The ad tees up the conclusion that itโ€™s possible for TVs to perform almost perfectly as an object of envy. Like the Wall Street Journal letter, it sets up an open loop, prompting the reader to ask โ€œbut how do TVs work so much better on the shop floor than mine here at home?โ€

The conclusion โ€“ that itโ€™s possible to keep a TV working near-perfectly with just a few adjustments almost anyone can make if they learn how โ€“ is presented as the answer to a mystery, increasing the likelihood the reader will pay attention. By halfway through, the reader is ready to accept that โ€“ provided someone could show them the secrets โ€“ they want in.

How to Use It

This letter is perfect for sales pages and long landing pages.

Nine-times-out-of-ten in modern internet marketing, our readers have their guard up. Theyโ€™ve seen a lot of promises on the internet, most of which havenโ€™t lived up to the hype.

Could you โ€œmeet them in the middle,โ€ by acknowledging that they havenโ€™t had great results so far, as the TV ad does by acknowledging that the readers have had incessant problems with their TVs?

Could you set up the most-difficult-to-accept premise โ€“ that good results are possible, even if the reader hasnโ€™t seen them โ€“ by framing it as something an exclusive group of others gets to enjoy, that the reader is missing out on?

One thing is crucially important thoughโ€ฆ

Donโ€™t forget to supply proof of every claim later on in the ad. As Robert Cialdini describes in his book Pre-Suasion, any tactic which increases the sensitivity to a premise โ€“ like the fact that youโ€™re missing out on a benefit others get to enjoy โ€“ will backfire if you donโ€™t prove it.

Skip The Learning Curve By Stealing From The Greats

If it seems like a lot to absorb, just remember: all of the great ads have the same fundamentalsโ€ฆ

Plausability Authority storytelling

โ€ฆjust in different proportions.

So I like to use a simple 3-question format to decide the best approach. Iโ€™ve written about it on my blog, but Iโ€™ll summarize it here:

Question 1: How plausible does your audience find your solution to their problem?

If youโ€™re selling a well-understood product in a category thatโ€™s widely-acknowledge to work, you donโ€™t need to burn a lot of calories convincing people a solution to their problems is possible.

If, like Gary Halbert, youโ€™re selling to a market thatโ€™s open-minded to your offer, but theyโ€™ve never seen it succeed in real life, his โ€œDesperate Nerdโ€ approach might work to grab readersโ€™ attention.

Just make sure youโ€™re supplying enough authority.

Question 2: How high competition is your market?

Even if youโ€™re competing with hundreds of solutions that are widely-acknowledged-to-work, as you would with an iPhone flashlight app, youโ€™re still competing with hundreds of solutions.

In cases in which competition is high, but cynicism is low, Sugarmanโ€™s Blublockers ad is a great example. His readers knew sunglasses worked, so he didnโ€™t need to prove that. But they saw sunglasses as an undifferentiated commodity, so Sugarman used creative storytelling to create a brand new category for Blublockers.

The Wall Street Journal conquered a similar market with their Two Men ad: people arenโ€™t exactly cynical about newspaper subscriptions, but many likely believe one paper is just-as-good-as-the-next.

Question 3: How jaded is your market?

Are you competing in a market thatโ€™s not only flooded with competitionโ€ฆ

itโ€™s flooded with huckstersย and solutions that donโ€™t work?

If your marketโ€™s B2B, and youโ€™ve got a killer track-record of success, you can probably differentiate with a simple explanation of the benefits of your product, and a little proof, like Frank Kernโ€™s ad.

Otherwise, you probably need a back-door approach, like Eugene Schwartzโ€™ Why Havenโ€™t TV Owners Been Told These Facts example. The market the TV ad was aimed at is the most challenging:

  • Cynical the solution works
  • โ€œOver-saturatedโ€ from offers
  • Cynical about those offers, because theyโ€™ve seen so many that donโ€™t work

โ€ฆwhich is exactly the market many internet marketers find ourselves in. Like Schwartzโ€™ example, we have to do a tap-dance:

Capture interest without raising any red-flagsโ€ฆ

Prove the solution is possibleโ€ฆ

and, finally, prove our solution is the best.


Scroll to Top