There are few better people to learn direct response copywriting from than the โAdmenโ: the original rockstar copywriters of the twentieth century magazine and newspaper ads.
Iโve sifted through the reams of great copywriting and distilled things down to just five examples.
All the examples for this article are โbite-sizedโ โ short enough to read without taking up too much time โ but also containing all the persuasive elements necessary to do the job.
But copying othersโ work will only get you so far without understanding why it worked. Thatโs why, for each example, Iโm going to deconstruct exactly what made it so effective, then tell you how to apply it in your funnel.
Here they are: the best five sales letters of all time.
Sales Letter #1: Gary Halbertโs Desperate Nerd From Ohio
Why You Need to Know It
In sales youโre always trying to climb two metaphorical mountains โ plausibility and authority โ in different proportions, depending on the product and market.
Plausibility means can you convince the reader a solution is possible. Say youโre teaching them to make money from home. If a reader sees your ad and thinks โthatโs hogwash โ no one can do that,โ youโre dead-in-the-water.
Garyโs ad is the perfect vehicle for a market who needs some convincing. The โdesperate nerdโ bit isnโt accidental; itโs the crucial bit that proves to the audience Garyโs โmoneymaking secretโ is possible. Why? By telling the story of someone who started worse off than the average reader, and still got amazing results.
โIf a DESPERATE NERD can do it,โ imagines a reader, โmaybe I can too.โ
But thatโs only half of the pictureโฆ
Authority means the reader trusts (a) that you have the ability to solve the problem and that (b) you have a monopoly on the solution.
The first is important because unless the reader believes you can solve his problem, he wonโt pay you to do it, and the second is important because unless he believes youโre the best solution, heโll either do it himself or find the lowest-priced competitor.
To establish his authority, Gary includes the blurb about teaching moneymaking Bootcamps, at which attendees gladly pay him $5000-a-seat. He also includes specific numbers, like โmake up to 10,000 per dayโ, and โI was once paid $2,500 for one of these.โ
How to Use It
This is a great template for Facebook ads and landing pages, provided your market fits the moldโฆ
Selling a solution to a market that hasnโt been exposed to your offer before, and are skeptical of their chances of success? Donโt be afraid to use a compelling anecdoteโฆ
Whatโs a detail about you that made is more unlikely, and hence, will make you more relatable to the reader? (Dyslexia, you started off broke, everybody told you โit couldnโt be doneโ, etc.)
Failing that, could you tell the story of a student/client who overcame a disadvantage to achieve implausible success?
Donโt forget to supply ample proof, though; otherwise they wonโt believe you really have the secret solution.
Could you include real screenshots of your results? (i.e. a payment you received, or a competition you won)
Have you been featured in media, or spoken at events the reader is likely to have heard of? Include the logos, and/or mention where youโve been featured, just as Gary does with his $5000-a-head bootcamps.
Sales Letter #2: Frank Kernโs consulting letter โ Would You Like Me To Personally Doubleโฆ Your Business, For Free?
Why You Need to Know It
Frank might be the most-copied direct response marketer of the modern era, from the โfrom the desk ofโ to the cadence of the headline โ โ2x, 3xโฆeven 5x!!!โ
But the genius of this landing page is how it cuts through a crowded space with authority (Kernโs name) and surprise (wait โ heโll do it for FREE?).
It has the same ingredients of the Halbert ad but in different proportions. Unlike Gary, Kernโs selling consulting B2B, so he doesnโt waste much ink proving that growth is possible; presumably the reader already knows this, otherwise he wouldnโt be in business.
But what it lacks in novelty, it makes-up-for with proof and authority โ โIโve generated over 47 millionโ, and a risk reversal โ โIโll write you a check for $1500โ.
Finally, it has built in scarcity (the reader knows Frankโs famous, and imagines that his 1:1 spots are limited, and Frank reminds us).
How to Use It
This is perfect for Facebook ads, landing pages, sales pages, and even sales emails in a crowded market, if your readers are jaded, and if youโve got some personal authority or a track-record of success.
Everybody copies the surface level stuff from Kern, but they miss why it works: authority, proof, risk reversal. Want to sell high ticket consulting or a 4-figure info product? How could you prove to the reader itโs going to work? Could you offer a guarantee, as Frank does? If youโre not as well known (few are) could you make your clients/studentsโ success the highlight?
Finally, what tangible result could you point to โwould you like me to grow your sales 25% in 3 daysโ โ and what surprise element? (โOr your money back/Iโll pay you/etc.โ)
Sales Letter #3: Joseph Sugarmanโs Vision Breakthrough
Why You Need to Know It
YES, dear readerโฆ
You absolutely need the basics of persuasion in your adโฆ
Value, authority, proof.
But what if nobody actually reads your copy because itโs so booooooring?!?
Ever see an Andre Chaperon email? (Or a carbon-copy)
If you have, thereโs a surefire way to recognize it. Guess what it is?
Cโmon โ bet you canโt guessโฆ
Itโs the very writing style I just used above. A narrative style that pulls your eye down the page.
โฆand thatโs not all ๐
It makes it fun to read.
And the modern godfather of โstickyโ copy thatโs fun-to-read regardless of its content is one Mr. Joseph Sugarman.
The Blublockers ad, better than maybe-any-other, typifies Sugarmanโs meandering style, a big contrast to the National Enquirer-style ads of Gary Halbert and John Carlton. Those โboy eats own headโ ads often donโt work for higher-sophistication markets, but Sugarmanโs approach does.
But it still contains the โcrucial ingredientsโโฆ
The audience thinks they know sunglasses, but Sugarman needs to create a brand new product category. The ad needs to pierce the jadedness around sunglasses (which it does with the โslippery slideโ narrative style), but also, once theyโre reading, to prove these arenโt any ordinary sunglasses; he does that with the content of the opening story, but also by doing what Eugene Schwartz calls โmechanizingโ; describing the construction and finally, with the guarantee.
How to Use It
If youโre selling a version of something everybody thinks theyโve seen before, what story could you tell to grab their interest?
More microscopically, how could you phrase your copy so it reads like poetry, each sentence coaxing the eye to the nextโฆ
Could you leave โopen loopsโ, leaving a question unresolvedโฆ
While you talk about something tangentially related, so the reader keeps reading.
Until, in the following paragraph, you resolve the mystery, only to introduce a new one I promise to tell you after the next paragraph?
Finally, could you tell an entertaining origin story that creates a brand new category for your product, as Sugarman does here, or as the Dyson company did for its household vacuums?
Sales Letter #4: Martin Conroyโs Two Young Men letter for the Wall Street Journal
Why You Need to Know It
It earned over 2 billion in subscriptions for the Wall Street Journal between 1975 and 2003. But even thatโs not the most important reasonโฆ
Psychology tells us an โopen loopโ narrative styleโฆ
that leads with a mysteryโฆ ๐
โฆis more attention-grabbing than a simple statement of benefits.
At the end of the โtwo menโ intro weโre left with an unresolved question โ how is it one man became president of the company โ and that holds our attention through the description of the journal. To say that by modern sales letter standards the โtwo menโ letter is short on proof misses the point: the tap dance this letter must accomplish is to stop short enough of promising the journal will lead to wealth, to avoid legal disclaimers, while implying that a subscription will lead to success strongly enough to plant a seed in the readerโs mind.
How to Use It
The tone of the โtwo menโ letter is a great fit for Facebook ads, email funnels, and sales pages for a certain category of product. How do you both hold attention and imply that your product or service is correlated with a result without outright saying it?
If your readers are jaded or bored with the product category (for instance: newspapers), this mystery-driven approach could work better than a direct one. You can also set up a mystery at the end of one email and promise to resolve it in the next one, which will ensure itโs more widely-read.
Sales Letter #5: Why Havenโt TV Owners Been Told These Facts, from Breakthrough Advertising by Eugene Schwartz
Read the complete letter here
Why You Need to Know It
Here, we have the same problems Halbert was solving with the Desperate Nerd ad, but in different proportions.
The readers still needed convincing of the plausibility of the solution. As Schwartz describes it:
โOnly a small fraction considered themselves interested enough or capable enough to respond to a direct promise headline: โSave up to $100 a year on your TV repairs!โ Most were afraid they could not make the repairs themselves.โ
But they were also a jaded market, so the sensationalist, โboy-eats-own-headโ approach Halbert and John Carlton are known for would have raised too many โred flags.โ
The TV repair ad, as rewritten, is a masterclass on the subtle techniques of winning over a reader whoโs seen it all before, and thinks itโs not for him.
The โenvy rationaleโ it sets up โ that thereโs a group of people enjoying superior results, and wouldnโt you like to be them โ is a high-leverage tool modern copywriters like Ramit Sethi use to sell nearly-$10,000 info products.
Hereโs why it works: As Schwartz describes, the market didnโt yet believe they had the ability to repair their own TVs.
But they had frustration that their TVs didnโt work as intended.
So thatโs where the ad starts โ โwhy havenโt TV owners been told these facts.โ The ad tees up the conclusion that itโs possible for TVs to perform almost perfectly as an object of envy. Like the Wall Street Journal letter, it sets up an open loop, prompting the reader to ask โbut how do TVs work so much better on the shop floor than mine here at home?โ
The conclusion โ that itโs possible to keep a TV working near-perfectly with just a few adjustments almost anyone can make if they learn how โ is presented as the answer to a mystery, increasing the likelihood the reader will pay attention. By halfway through, the reader is ready to accept that โ provided someone could show them the secrets โ they want in.
How to Use It
This letter is perfect for sales pages and long landing pages.
Nine-times-out-of-ten in modern internet marketing, our readers have their guard up. Theyโve seen a lot of promises on the internet, most of which havenโt lived up to the hype.
Could you โmeet them in the middle,โ by acknowledging that they havenโt had great results so far, as the TV ad does by acknowledging that the readers have had incessant problems with their TVs?
Could you set up the most-difficult-to-accept premise โ that good results are possible, even if the reader hasnโt seen them โ by framing it as something an exclusive group of others gets to enjoy, that the reader is missing out on?
One thing is crucially important thoughโฆ
Donโt forget to supply proof of every claim later on in the ad. As Robert Cialdini describes in his book Pre-Suasion, any tactic which increases the sensitivity to a premise โ like the fact that youโre missing out on a benefit others get to enjoy โ will backfire if you donโt prove it.
Skip The Learning Curve By Stealing From The Greats
If it seems like a lot to absorb, just remember: all of the great ads have the same fundamentalsโฆ
โฆjust in different proportions.
So I like to use a simple 3-question format to decide the best approach. Iโve written about it on my blog, but Iโll summarize it here:
Question 1: How plausible does your audience find your solution to their problem?
If youโre selling a well-understood product in a category thatโs widely-acknowledge to work, you donโt need to burn a lot of calories convincing people a solution to their problems is possible.
If, like Gary Halbert, youโre selling to a market thatโs open-minded to your offer, but theyโve never seen it succeed in real life, his โDesperate Nerdโ approach might work to grab readersโ attention.
Just make sure youโre supplying enough authority.
Question 2: How high competition is your market?
Even if youโre competing with hundreds of solutions that are widely-acknowledged-to-work, as you would with an iPhone flashlight app, youโre still competing with hundreds of solutions.
In cases in which competition is high, but cynicism is low, Sugarmanโs Blublockers ad is a great example. His readers knew sunglasses worked, so he didnโt need to prove that. But they saw sunglasses as an undifferentiated commodity, so Sugarman used creative storytelling to create a brand new category for Blublockers.
The Wall Street Journal conquered a similar market with their Two Men ad: people arenโt exactly cynical about newspaper subscriptions, but many likely believe one paper is just-as-good-as-the-next.
Question 3: How jaded is your market?
Are you competing in a market thatโs not only flooded with competitionโฆ
itโs flooded with huckstersย and solutions that donโt work?
If your marketโs B2B, and youโve got a killer track-record of success, you can probably differentiate with a simple explanation of the benefits of your product, and a little proof, like Frank Kernโs ad.
Otherwise, you probably need a back-door approach, like Eugene Schwartzโ Why Havenโt TV Owners Been Told These Facts example. The market the TV ad was aimed at is the most challenging:
- Cynical the solution works
- โOver-saturatedโ from offers
- Cynical about those offers, because theyโve seen so many that donโt work
โฆwhich is exactly the market many internet marketers find ourselves in. Like Schwartzโ example, we have to do a tap-dance:
Capture interest without raising any red-flagsโฆ
Prove the solution is possibleโฆ
and, finally, prove our solution is the best.