The Changing Face Of Using Live Chat For Conversion

by Art

Last updated on July 31st, 2017

Live chat software isn’t anything new in the online world, but it’s still something that can be extremely valuable to customers and (as you’re about to find out…) for conversion.

Making a phone call disrupts workflow—and often involves sitting on hold—and email response times can be slow, whereas live chat is fast and more personal.

But when it’s done badly, such as failing to respond to customer inquiries or appearing as offline for long periods of time, live chat can actually have a negative impact on conversion.

Most people have heard of heritage providers like Velaro and Kayako, but there’s a wave of new live chat software startups that suggest a paradigm shift in the world of live chat.

I’ve identified six big trends in particular, and it seems to me that each of them speaks to a desire to improve the conversion rate of live chat as well as making it a more powerful tool for marketers and CROs.


The data associated with live chat software has been a little lacking in the past – measures like ‘number of messages required per customer’ can be misleading if a customer is particularly chatty or an inquiry is very difficult to explain.

Traditionally, this has made it difficult to optimize the live chat experience with an aim to improve conversion. HappyFox Chat is one company that’s looking to improve this aspect of the live chat experience.

happy fox live chat software

With a background in helpdesk software, they place a lot of stock in data and provide users with info about wait times, response times etc. as well as just average chat duration.

They also offer a UI that allows agents to manage multiple chats in a number of different ways and displays contextual information from other apps (via integrations, of which HappyFox aims to have 100 by Christmas 2015) on the dashboard.

Other companies, like PureChat, are looking to change the face of live chat based on data we already have about live chat.

For example, that unhelpful ‘User is currently offline’ message often associated with live chat is pretty unpopular…which is dangerous given that we know 45% of US customers will abandon a transaction if their query isn’t answered quickly.

Having reliable data that relates to live chat software is hugely valuable for marketers and CRO testers, as it allows them to really understand the impact live chat has on their website and whether or not the expected ROI is worth the cost.


I think it’s fair to say that a lot of existing live chat products are a bit…beige.

That doesn’t mean that they don’t do their job well, but aesthetics often seem to be an afterthought on the part of live chat software developers.

Products like Chatra are aiming to change that with a friendly, IM-like user interface that substitutes impersonal, anonymous stuff like ‘Visitor #17364’ and silhouettes with colors and corresponding names like ‘Jaffa Orange’.

chatra live chat software

While it’s true that nice, friendly design doesn’t automatically mean better conversion, it’s the flexibility and leg up that a modern piece of software offers that can be a difference maker.

For example, dedicated Mac, Windows, iOS and Android apps that function like iMessage or WhatsApp mean that support agents aren’t tied to their desks or work computers.

Features like one click group chats and the ability to see what visitors are typing before they hit send, both available in Chatra, make use of technical advancements to make the lives of support agents easier.

But why is that important for conversion?

As well as allowing agents to respond more quickly, it makes hours of support more pain-free and manageable. Mobile and cloud apps open up all sorts of different ways to compensate agents for answering OOH queries from home.


Many business owners will recommend against building a house on rented land. However, that hasn’t stopped some new live chat products relying heavily on integration with existing software.

For example, Chatlio’s entire service is built around integrating live chat with Slack.

chatlio live chat software

As far as integrations go, I have to admit that it seems like a pretty good choice: maybe it’s just me, but every organization I speak to these days seems to be using Slack.

Chatlio doesn’t require its own app or tab, which is perfect if you’re already a Slack power user and don’t want to have to get to grips with a new piece of software.

At the other end of the scale, Intercom is building their own live chat service (Intercom Acquire – currently in beta) to integrate with their core product offering – a service that helps you merge existing communication channels like email, helpdesk software and CRM packages into one platform.

Even newer modern chat services that don’t have mobile offerings of their own, like Olark for example, offer integrations with apps like Jabiru and Trillian.

Integrating live chat with existing tools is a good way to improve efficiency; many support agents will already be trying to balance using a suite of products like Skype, Facebook, WhatsApp etc. The more tools support agents need to juggle, the more likely it is that they could miss potential customers’ inquiries.

Clearly, this has a negative impact on conversion, not to mention how the brand is perceived, so integrations serve a much bigger purpose than just making support agents’ lives easier.




For this point I’m focusing on the feature itself, rather than a particular tool, as it now forms a key part of many major live chat providers‘ offerings and has been around for a few years.

‘Triggered actions’ proactively prompt conversations with potential customers when certain criteria, such as time spent on page or navigating towards the ‘close window’ button, are met.

If you find these annoying (and there’s no doubt that they can be if the copy used is obnoxious), apparently, you’re in the minority. Back in 2012, BoldChat found that 66% of UK and US shoppers are ‘receptive’ or ‘appreciative’ of the customer service team making the first move with live chat.

Additionally, 57% of those surveyed indicated that proactivity would actively encourage them to chat with a website’s support team.

In terms of conversion, the advantage of proactive triggers is that they allow webmasters to turn every page on their site into a prospective landing page. If nothing else, even just enabling the default triggers and text provides a last ditch effort to recapture leads who are about to abandon ship.

Flexible (/Offsite)

purechat live chat software

PureChat provides chat solutions for more places than just your website – their hosted widget comes with a URL that can be added to email signatures, social media pages etc.

Pairing live chat with social media helps people to avoid long email chains and provides potential customers with times to get in touch – PureChat allows users to create a schedule and display their availability automatically when they’re logged in on the web or a mobile device – without the need for a website.

This in itself says something about how live chat is changing to keep up with the way technology is evolving. For example, a business owner might generate a lot of leads through Twitter or Instagram but operate entirely on Etsy. A service like PureChat gives them a way to implement live chat to answer queries without setting up a standalone website.

Live chat has already proven its worth when it comes to lead gen so, even though it’s early days, I expect that we’ll see more live chat tools try to make inroads into social media, hosted pages and so on.


With the rise of compact startup teams, and even solopreneurs taking on all aspects of business themselves, job titles are becoming more fluid.

As a result, it’s not uncommon for people with development skills to be taking on support roles and vice versa.

This is reflected in the creation of a couple of different support tools that, in my opinion, would probably be pretty intimidating to those without any development knowledge.

For example, there’s Respoke. With just a few lines of JavaScript, Respoke allows you to add voice and video live chat to your mobile app or service using peer-to-peer communication.

respoke live chat software

They also offer a publish and subscribe API that allows both group chats and the broadcasting of messages to (potentially) tens of thousands of clients as well as screen sharing and the ability to switch seamlessly between camera video, screen share or voice only.

Or consider Icecomm. Still in beta, Icecomm is a “serverless” video chat and file transfer. The first video chat powered by Icecomm was created in JSFiddle — 8 lines of front end JavaScript—but has since has evolved to suite of SDKs for e-commerce, email and phone integration.

icecomm live chat software

Like Respoke, it’s a product that works best if you have some familiarity with JS. As well as in-browser video chat, it’s already been used to power in-game chat, P2P file sharing and video chat that allows you to take control of other participants’ cameras.

As a non-techie, I’m pretty sure that these products are beyond me. However, even I can see their potential to create something a bit more interesting than your standard live chat window in the corner of the screen.

As live chat becomes ubiquitous, creating something eye-catching and out of the ordinary that does more than just pop up and say ‘Hi, can I help?’ holds all sorts of potential for improving the conversion rate of a site…even if I’m not quite technical enough to nail any of it down in this small space.


When you think of live chat, it’s easy to think only of the big players in the market – Kayako, Velaro etc. Yes, these tools are designed to help with conversion but they’re also a luxury to a certain extent.

Live chat gives a site a certain level of credibility and trust, but that’s not necessarily directly linked to improving conversion or user experience.

Disruptive is a term that’s overused, but I do think it applies to the tools above. In each case you can see how what the tools do is designed to add significant value to implementing live chat, beyond just appearing more receptive and friendly.

Found a live chat tool that does something cool we just HAVE to know about? Please let us know in the comments below!



Get updates on new articles, webinars and other opportunities:


Art is a freelance copywriter/content marketer based in the UK. He's worked with both startups and large corporations on topics ranging from fitness to tech and business issues.


Comment Policy

Please join the conversation! We like long and thoughtful communication.
Abrupt comments and gibberish will not be approved. Please, only use your real name, not your business name or keywords. We rarely allow links in your comment.
Finally, please use your favorite personal social media profile for the website field.


Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. October 29, 2015 at 9:53 am

    Hi Art,

    thanks for this great article. It contains a lot of inspiration about where the live chat market (and online communication between businesses and customers in general) is heading. I think the Slack integration of Chatlio is a really smart move.

    Best regards,
    Vladimir Sandera

  2. September 14, 2015 at 11:47 am

    Hi Art,
    Thanks for mentioning HappyFox Chat. And happy that you got the idea right.
    We’re focused on taking live chat to the next level. From being used as an “engagement” tool to a full suite business communication tool focused on “conversions”.

    Because, in today’s marketing world of multiple channel attribution, the few minutes you get to chat with your potential customer is crucial. And it should go beyond engagement and get to conversions.

    HappyFox Chat lets you do it by bringing in a better (I know it sounds cliche but try the app and you’ll know what I mean) chat experience that is truly “live” and by helping you integrate with third part apps in your marketing stack. Like for example, Salesforce or Google Analytics.

    And I don’t mean flimsy band aid integration, but well baked deep integration. Like being able to see your customer lead status within the chat window, or being able to automatically add the customer to your MailChimp newsletter list, post a chat.

    If you think about it, it makes so much sense for growth hackers and marketers, shortening their user journeys and boosting conversions. The opportunities are plenty.

    We hope you enjoy the app. BTW, it’s totally Free (not any stripped down version, but a fully loaded product), so feel free to take it for a spin and let us know your thoughts.

    Mani Karthik

  3. Agnieszka / LiveChat says:
    September 14, 2015 at 10:40 am

    Hi! I work at LiveChat so everything that you mentioned is familiar to me 🙂

    You wrote about data – I agree, there are a lot of information that you can get from your reports if you know how to 🙂 (here’s our report about what you can measure and how to analyse it, take a look if you’re interested: Speaking of data analysing – you asked about some cool option that you have to know about. There is a report in LiveChat called “staff prediction” – thanks to this report you will know how many agents should be on a shift in particular time.

    You also mentioned design. I fully agree that modern design can make using application much more pleasant, but from my point of view intuitive interface should be the most important thing.

    I also agree with what you said about adding link to the chat in every ‘touch point’ with the brand. A lot of companies add links to their livechat to their e-mail footers, mailings and so on. I guess in a few years it will be a standard – not an exception.

    One more thing – proactive chats. Yep, it can be annoying if a livechat agent acts like a pushy shop assistant 😉 But if a greeting is personalised, it can be very effective.


    Agnieszka / LiveChat

  4. Chris frascella says:
    September 14, 2015 at 8:56 am

    Art, thanks for sharing this information about how other providers are also pushing the envelope in the live chat space. The “colorful” agent-side UX and non-website-based chat is particularly interesting to me personally.

    One point of clarification: actionable data (being “data-driven”) is a chief benefit for Velaro customers. You can evaluate this for yourself in the Hygiena case study from the Crazy Egg blog last month.

    Also, I’d be interested in hearing a layman’s explanation for how serverless chat addresses data privacy/security concerns, as that’s often a priority we need to speak to with our prospective customers. Because of this, it’s a major priority for us (and for other live chat vendors, I’m sure).

    Thanks again for putting this together!

    • Art says:
      September 15, 2015 at 4:54 am

      Hi Chris,

      Thanks for reading! I certainly wasn’t trying to imply that Velaro and other products are *not* data-driven, just that some newer faces are positioning their relationship with data as a key focus of their product 🙂

      That’s a damn good question, and it’s one that I hope the folks at Icecomm (or another comparable service) could elaborate on if they find their way to this comment because I have to admit that I don’t know much about the security implications of serverless chat. Sorry about that!

      All the best,

Show Me My Heatmap

Set up some new tests today with - awesome tool, recommend for folk

Alex Peters


What makes people leave your website?